UC DANR
Conservation Biology Workgroup
Report FY2005-2006
WG ratified 1999, Re-ratified 2004
Chair: C.O. Qualset, Genetic Resources Conservation Program (GRCP)
- a) Activities: Summaries of workgroup meetings, in-service
training sessions, and other events and activities conducted
for workgroup members. For each activity, include intended purposes,
the number of ANR members attending, and funding or in-kind support
received from non-ANR sources.
The focus of the Cooperative is to improve, through educational
events, the understanding of the underlying biology of native
Pinus radiata forests (an ecologically restricted forest
type that is endemic to only central coastal California and two
Mexican islands and is threatened by habitat loss, fragmentation
and other development pressures). Its activities have been supported
since its inception in 2001 by a combination of funds that have
included grants from the Packard Foundation, the Resources Legacy
Fund Foundation, private contributions, and GRCP general funds.
Participants since 2001 have included several WG members and
other ANR and non-ANR UC research and extension personnel.
The primary Coop event since last years WG report was
held July 27, 2005 at Monterey City Council Chambers, City Hall,
in Monterey CA. WG member Deborah Rogers (GRCP/DANR) convened
the session to present a seminar (Propagation of Monterey
Pine in New Zealand) by visiting scientist Cathy Hargreaves
(Forest Research, Rotorua, New Zealand). The seminar attracted
approximately 20 participants from government agencies, the California
Coastal Commission, nonprofit environmental organizations (e.g.,
California Native Plant Society), and interested individuals.
Dr. Hargreaves was completing a six month sabbatical during which
she worked at the National Center for Genetic Resources Preservation
in Fort Collins, CO.
WG meetings
WG membership has been invited to a June 8, 2006 meeting to
be convened by GRCP to update conservation biology status at
campuses and other units, to assess conservation biology needs
(staffing, degree programs, courses), and to explore conservation
biology outreach possibilities. As of this date (May 2, 2006),
12 WG members have indicated their intent to participate.
- b) Accomplishments: Narrative summary (1-2 pages) of the
workgroups accomplishments in each of the following areas:
- Addressing specific high priority issues or concerns affecting
Division clientele;
- Enhancing collaborative planning and coordination of research
and extension activities across organizational units of the Division,
including AES and CE;
- Building linkages with non-ANR cooperators to improve
coordination and impact and/or leverage resources;
- Increasing knowledge or skills of workgroup members; and
- Involving workgroup members in collective planning and
decision making to identify and prioritize issues, goals and
activities to be pursued by the workgroup.
- ANR priorities: The WG with GRCP leadership and support
continues to address several Division priorities. Because the
conservation of genetic resources critical to California was
a high priority of the Division, GRCP was established by the
Division in 1985. This remains a high priority for the Division
and GRCP continues with state funding in spite of recent Division
budget shortages. In addition, the field of conservation biology
underlies activities that address several ANR core issues emphasized
in 2005: Invasive Species; Pest Management; Sustainability and
Viability of Agriculture, all high priorities, and Land Use and
Sustainable Use of Natural Resources, medium priorities.
Conservation biology collaborations within WG and beyond:
WG membership is called on by GRCP for advice and guidance primarily
by email with the circulation of relevant proposals and publications.
In this fiscal year GRCP Research Geneticist Rogers collaborated
on research proposals with CE personnel and non-ANR academic
personnel (CE Advisor Costello and UCSC postdoc Jason Hoeksema).
Conservation biology in an agricultural context includes the
management of genetic resources in crops and livestock that minimize
detrimental impacts on biodiversity, such as improved pest resistance
to reduce pesticide impacts. GRCP published in 2005, with support
from the Global Crop Diversity Trust, an informational document,
Safeguarding the Future of U.S. Agriculture: The Need to
Conserve Threatened Collections of Crop Diversity Worldwide.
The authors of this 45-page document were WG chair Qualset
and H.L. Shands, Director of the US National Center for Genetic
Resources Preservation. The report was released at a Congressional
Briefing in the U.S. Congress and is accessible from the GRCP
website: http://www.grcp.ucdavis.edu/publications/SafeAgdex.htm.
WG Chair Qualset presented papers on in situ conservation
of crops and wild crop relatives at the International Botanical
Congress [Vienna], the International Ethnobotany Congress [Istanbul],
Mars, Inc. Symposium [McLean, VA], and SIRS, a local service
group. He also chaired a review for the International Plant Genetic
Resources Institute of a World Bank-supported project on upgrading
of eleven gene banks of the Consultative Group for International
Agricultural Research. The review showed that the international
gene banks are in good position to support the needs for genetic
resources for California agriculture and for basic research.
WG member S. Carrizosa is currently working on a new conservation
biology project concerning policy of biodiversity access and
benefit sharing projects focusing on the biotechnology and legal
issues involved in biodiversity prospecting. Support for this
effort comes from the World Conservation Union and GRCP. This
is a follow-on to the book edited by Carrizosa, S. Brush
[UCD], B. Wright [UCB], and WG member P. McGuire [GRCP]
Accessing Biodiversity and Sharing the Benefits: Lessons
from Implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity,
published in 2004. This effort contributes to policy development
that is needed to assure access by UC scientists for biological
resources for research and for sustaining California agriculture.
Building linkages: WG member Rogers participated
in a Science Review of the Resources Legacy Fund Foundations
Preserving Wild California Program, Sacramento, CA (November
21, 2005). The objective of the Foundation was to determine how
well their funding program elicited projects based on the best
conservation science and how to improve if necessary.
WG members Rogers and McGuire (and two UCD faculty,
Drs. Mark Schwartz and David Neale) provided a letter (March
2006) to the California Coastal Commission that explained genetic
diversity and forest health issues related to their consideration
of a development plan in the Monterey pine forest area of Carmel,
CA.
WG member Rogers provided information on various natural
resource issues when requested by government representatives,
including: information on population genetics of forest tree
species and genetic information on whitebark pine to John W.
Schwandt, Forest Health Protection, USDA Forest Service, Idaho
(July 22, 2005); information to USDA Forest Service, as requested
by Dr. Rob Mangold (WO), on genetic issues related to a pest
problem in a native Hawaiian tree species and genetic sampling
procedures; and information/ recommendations to Thom McCue, Senior
Planner with Monterey Planning Commission on a Monterey pine
issue on private land (June 28, 2005).
Increasing knowledge: WG member Rogers, with editing by
WG member McGuire, developed a set of 12 Factsheets
for the USDA Forest Service to improve the understanding among
their natural resource managers of the importance and structure
of genetic diversity and how it can be considered in management
decisions. These are in press and, when complete, will be available
from the GRCP website with a link from the WG webpages.
WG members Rogers and McGuire, in collaboration
with UCD AES Professor Kevin Rice will present a one-day
short course on the genetic issues of restoration projects
on June 24, 2006 in conjunction with the annual meeting of the
Society of Conservation Biology held this year in San Jose, CA.
WG member Rogers released a report in June, 2005, to the
California Dept. of Parks and Recreation on genetic monitoring
to improve management of native species in California parks.
The report is posted on the GRCP website at http://www.grcp.ucdavis.edu/projects/CalParkdex.htm.
The document is based on the reports and recommendations from
a meeting sponsored by the Dept. of Parks and Recreation in last
fiscal year (February 2005).
Collective planning: At least 12 WG members will participate
in the assessment and planning meeting set for June 8, 2006 (as
described above under Activities).
c) Identify workgroups outcomes in terms of new knowledge,
technologies or practices developed and/or disseminated and the
ultimate impacts of the workgroup activity, in terms of environmental,
social and/or economic consequences attributable to the workgroups
operations activity; include data and summary of methods used
to assess immediate outcomes and ultimate impacts and description
of audience affected.
The audience for the WG's activity includes the WG membership
itself and academic conservation biology researchers throughout
the UC system. In addition, state and federal agencies and NGOs
with ecosystem management and research responsibilities are among
the beneficiaries. The WG serves as one arm of GRCPs mission
to address conservation of native genetic resources. The WG enhances
GRCP efforts in this area, especially with the budget cuts taken
by GRCP in FY2003-2004 and continued in FY2004-2005 and FY2005-2006.
New knowledge: The efforts by WG members from GRCP,
Qualset, Rogers, Carrizosa, and McGuire,
listed above in this report under Activities and
Accomplishments represent contributions to increasing
knowledge relevant to conservation biology.
An update of the status of conservation biology activities
in the UC system is still ongoing. When complete it will be posted
on the GRCP website. The current systemwide assessment was made
in 1997. This information will provide WG members and any other
internet user a UC systemwide directory to programs and resources
relevant to conservation biology. This process will be facilitated
by the collaborative assessment to be conducted at the June 27,
2006 annual WG meeting (as described above under Activities).
A set of 12 genetic information Factsheets covering
the identification and monitoring of genetic diversity, the terminology
and technology employed, and the role of genetic diversity in
management decisions will be available from the GRCP website
(as described above under Accomplishments).
GRCP published Safeguarding the Future of U.S. Agriculture:
The Need to Conserve Threatened Collections of Crop Diversity
Worldwide (as described above under Accomplishments).
GRCP released a report in June, 2005 to the California Dept.
of Parks and Recreation on genetic monitoring to improve management
of native species in California parks (as described above under
Accomplishments).
Practices developed or disseminated: The role of tissue
culture propagation was presented at the July 27, 2005 Monterey
Pine Forest Ecosystem Cooperative meeting, with a focus on its
use for movement of genetic resources without spread of pathogens
(as described above in Activities). This is an important
consideration for the greater use of native Monterey pine germplasm
in areas that would be highly impacted if pathogens were to be
introduced.
The genetic issues facing restoration and conservation projects
will be presented in a short course for participants in the international
annual meeting of the Society for Conservation Biology, June
24, 2006 (as described above in Accomplishments).
The scientific and legal issues impacting policy development
and bioprospecting agreements are being collated and analyzed
by WG member Carrizosa for presentation in a volume to
be published by the World Conservation Union (IUCN) with assistance
from GRCP. This is a critical policy arena for California which
depends upon continued access to biological diversity for UC
basic research and sustainable agriculture (as described above
under Accomplishments).
Impacts: WG member Rogers and WG chair Qualset
were sought out for participation in reviews and assessments
and for advice in several instances for which their conservation
biology, and more specifically, conservation genetics, expertise
was valued (as described above under Accomplishments).
ConBioWorkGroup Home |
Membership |
Activities |
Projects
Home |
About Us |
Objectives |
Projects |
Publications |
Contacts
This page last updated August 27, 2006.
Copyright UC Regents. All rights reserved.
|